Star Warsgames of all genres, both old and new, are almost always top-notch uses of the legendary IP and flat-out fun regardless of setting. Because of the popularity of Star Wars as a whole and the stellar reputation of classic games likeKnights of the Old Republic,Force Unleashed, andBattlefront, publisher EA has been under serious scrutiny with the launch of each and everyStar Warstitle in recent years. Unfortunately, EA’s attempts to recover from controversies around 2017’sBattlefront 2may be putting popular newStar Warsgames likeSquadronsin danger.
Star Wars: Squadronshas proven extremely popular, helping breathe new life into the space combat genre and offering excellent gameplay at a competitive price. Because of that low price, the campaign is on the ‘short but sweet’ side, and multiplayer is the main focus. Even so, with only four starships for each side, relatively limited customization options, and just two game modes, many fans want more content just a few short weeks after launch. EA’s checkered past with multiplayerStar Wars games may hamstring additional content forSquadrons, though.
RELATED:Xbox Game Pass Should Actually Take EA Play a Step Further
Star Wars Battlefront 2 Changed EA Microtransactions For Good
EA had long been known for unsavory practices regarding DLC, loot boxes, and pay-to-win content up until the controversy surrounding the infamous publisher’s treatment ofBattlefront 2. The outrage over that game marked a turning point for EA, and likely the entire games industry.
After uproarious complaints about the thousands of hours it would take to unlock characters like Darth Vader and the exorbitant sums needed to gamble on loot boxes to speed up the process, EA posted a statement defending their microtransaction practices. That statement became themost downvoted post on Reddit in historyby a staggering margin, player complaints reached an all-time high, political attention was drawn to the legal implications of lootbox gambling, and EA scrambled to change its strategies.
Since then,EA has removed all paid loot boxes fromBattlefront 2. It has avoided adding microtransactions to other franchises likeBattlefieldin an attempt to regain goodwill, and Star Wars games likeJedi: Fallen Orderwere handled with care. So far, these tactics have worked. When EA announced the final update toBattlefront 2, over 50,000 players signed a petition to keep the game alive.Fallen Orderwas a critical success, andStar Wars: Squadronslaunched with no microtransactions to popular acclaim.
RELATED:Over 50,000 Star Wars Battlefront 2 Fans Sign Petition to Keep Game Alive
Microtransactions Can Keep Multiplayer Games Alive
It might be time that EA takes some tentative steps back towards including paid content in their games, though. As much as players often bemoan the addition of battlepasses and overbearing microtransactions, there is a fine line for developers to walk that helps keep multiplayer games alive. Paid cosmetics,light but rewarding battle passesand challenges, and other microtransactions that avoid pay-to-win mechanics or completely unattainable rewards are often vital to maintaining a player base and supporting continued content updates.
Star Wars: Squadronshas an active community that wants more maps, more gamemodes, the addition of the B-Wing and TIE Defender, new characters, more cosmetics, more ship modifications, and even story expansions. However, as of yet, there areno plans to add any such content, which spells a slow and steady death forSquadrons' community. Just a few paid cosmetics and a battle pass could easily support the live events and content drops that it takes to keep other multiplayer games likeCall of Duty,Fortnite,Apex Legends,Fall Guys, and countless others vibrant and active.
EA has re-gained quite a lot of respect for its commitment to more consumer-friendly practices, but it will soon need to learn how to toe the line. There is a sweet spot that makes it financially viable to continually support games without squeezing the player base for as much cash as possible. The fact is, most players don’t abhor microtransactions per se, it is thepredatory use of microtransactionsthat landed EA in hot water to begin with. When players can choose to buy a nice skin or charm every once in a while to keep their favorite games fresh, not many people really complain.
Star Wars: Squadronscertainly deserves some continued support. Right now, there is no other game quite like it, and it has brought back a niche genre that has long been relegated to the nostalgic 1990s memories ofX-Wing vs. TIE Fighterfans. With a big fanbase eating up its multiplayer gameplay,huge numbers of people watchingSquadronsstreams, and support for every control scheme from console gamepads to full VR flight rigs,Squadronshas the potential to live on for a long time. However, without a steady trickle of new content, it won’t be able to compete with other multiplayer games, and without microtransactions its unlikely that fledgling developer EA Motive could keep committing resources to the game.
It’s not as if leaving microtransactions out ofSquadronswould make it a total failure. The game is fun, affordable, and represents abright future for EA Motiveas the game’s success has paved the road for the studio to continue working on more ambitious projects. FutureBattlefrontgames may even borrow heavily fromSquadrons' flight mechanics, considering thatSquadronsused the same engine asBattlefront 2. It is important to note though that with this game, fans have gone from hating on EA for filling games with paid content to wishing that the publisher would assist developers in adding more cosmetics and ships.
Star Wars: Squadronsis available now on PC, PS4, and Xbox One.
MORE:Star Wars Squadrons Studio EA Motive Working on Multiple New Games
