Summary
Pokémonis an absolute cultural juggernaut. While at its core it is a video game series first and foremost, it exists as a media franchise on a much larger scale than the majority of video games can hope to match. It is, in fact, the highest grossing media franchise of all time. Far beyond just the console games, this is also thanks toPokémon’scopious amounts of merchandise, mobile games, trading cards, and of course, the anime and movies based on the franchise.
The first of those movies,Pokémon: The First Movie, was an instant hit among the fanbase and remains a thoroughly beloved piece of thePokémonfranchise to this day. Critics, however, were famously not nearly as fond of the picture as fans were, something that fans have been remarkably unhappy about over the years. So the question is, wasPokémon’sfirst step onto the big screen actually a success?
16%
Metacritic Score
35%
Pokémonwas unleashed upon the world in 1996, withPocket MonstersRed and Green releasing in Japan, followed byPokémon Red and Bluereleasing in the rest of the world months later. A year later, the anime series based on the video games was released. ThePokémonanime only loosely followed the plot of the games, featuring original human characters with a completely different story. Following the success of both the games and show, in 1998,Pokémonbecame an unprecedented worldwide sensation,in a phenomenon dubbed Pokémania. What’s important is that while the game series sold incredibly well and was undoubtedly a huge part of the craze, Pokémania was more centered around the anime.
Of the huge assortment ofPokémonproducts made during this period, ranging from official handbooks, to toy Pokédex’s, to board games, to even an official stage musical, nearly all of them were primarily based on the anime and featured Ash and friends. For a while, the anime was what most people knewPokémonfrom. A frequently airing cartoon was simply much easier to access than a series of RPG’s on the GameBoy. Even to this day, when a lot of people think ofPokémon, they think of Ash Ketchum. The prominence of the show has died down over time, and today the video games are undoubtedly the keystone of the franchise. However, there is no denying that thePokémonshow was a huge driving force that made the series popular to begin with,and the first movie was a huge part of that.
Pokémon: The First Moviewas, as expected, based off the anime and not the video games. It focuses on the legendary Pokémon Mewtwo, a clone of the first Pokémon, Mew, and his plan to seek revenge on humanity. He lures powerful Pokémon trainers, including Ash, Misty, and Brock, to his island and steals their Pokémon in order to clone them. The movie took a relatively mature tone compared to the usual series, with elements such as Ash’s near demise and the traumatic creation of Mewtwo. It also featured fun battle scenes and the show’s typical humor, and thus became a huge hit financially, elevating thePokémonbrand even further.
Was Pokemon: The First Movie Actually Good?
Pokémon: The First Movieis beloved among fans, considered by many to this day to still be the bestPokémonmovie ever made. ThePokémoncommunity seems to love the film for its darker themes and more mature elements.Quotes from Mewtwo and Meowthabout judging people based off of their actions and looking past their differences are still often quoted and even used as yearbook quotes by fans. They love the compelling portrayal of Mewtwo, the moving moment of Ash’s revival, and the respectful overall treatment the movie gives toPokémon.
The critical consensus for the movie, however, has never been nearly as positive as the fan reception. Upon release in America, the film was given negative reviews on the basis of being poorly dubbed, contradictory in its messaging, and overly childish. The movie has a critical score of only 16% on Rotten Tomatoes and a Metascore of 35%. The poor critical reception has often been bitterly brought up by fans, who use it to call critics out of touch, pretentious, or unable to have fun with movies. So, who’s correct? IsPokémon: The First Moviegood or bad?
The answer is that both are true, depending on what the person watching it is looking for.Pokémon: The First Movieexcels at being aPokémonmovie. It treats the source material with respect, it features a lot of fun battle scenes anda lot of differentPokémon, and it goes darker than would be standard for the target audience of children. There are a lot of positives there, and if someone went into the movie as aPokémonfan looking for a goodPokémonmovie, they would likely get a lot of enjoyment out of it as millions of otherPokémonfans have over the years.
With that being said, it’s fair to say that in the grand scheme of cinema,Pokémon: The First Movieis somewhat underwhelming, at least from the perspective of a film critic judging movies to a more artistic standard. It’s a movie specifically made to appeal toPokémonfans, which consequentially means there’s not much to enjoy if the viewer is unfamiliar with the series. And as thetarget audience forPokémonis children, it is still very much a children’s movie in spite of the attempt at a more mature tone. Moments like Ash being revived by the tears of Pokémon, while touching, could also be considered a bit cheesy by some. The English release had its maturity level cut down, with changed dialogue, an omitted Mewtwo monologue at the beginning, and a cut prologue showing Mewtwo’s traumatic creation. The movie’s main theme is also undeniably messy. Making the point that Pokémon shouldn’t be made to fight each other is a strange decision to make in a franchise completely focused on the creatures battling one another. It actually damages the perception of the series as a whole, making some wonder if Pokémon really do enjoy battling as fans would be led to believe.
There has been a strange phenomenon in recent years of fans taking issue with poor reviews for franchise films, citing these reviews as evidence that fans are out of touch. TheFive Nights at Freddy’smovieis a perfect example; the movie was beloved by fans, but received a subpar critical reception, which outraged some people who enjoyed the film. What people as a whole should come to realize is that there is a difference between liking a movie and thinking a movie is good.
Not every movie needs to be made with the intent of becoming an enduring classic or an Oscar winner. Some films are made to be fun, simple, and appealing to a very specific group of people. If a movie is made based off of a popular franchise or property made mostly for children, there’s a high chance it will not be an objectively high quality film. And that’s perfectly fine! Fans of that property can see a movie full of references and nods to the series they love, and enjoy it for what it is.
A movie critic will not watch the film in the same way. They’ll be watching it the same way they’d watch any movie, looking for certain marks of high quality that probably won’t be present in something likeFive Nights at Freddy’sorPokémon: The First Movie. This doesn’t mean that critics are out of touch, it means that they’re doing their jobs correctly. What this also means, however, is that no one should ever feel like they can’t enjoy a movie just because it wasn’t reviewed well. People are allowed to like different types of media for different reasons.Pokémon: The First Moviemay not be an excellent movie. It is, however, a greatPokémonmovie, and that’s more than enough for a lot of people who lovePokémon.
Pokemon
Pokemon is a franchise that needs no introduction. One of the most successful media empires in history, Pokemon spans games, television, films, manga, merchandise, music, and more.
RELATED:Pokemon Fan Shows Off Incredible Charizard Drawing That Took 2 Weeks To Finish
